Your message dated Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:56:23 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#204844: xlibs: libXt.so needs to be built with gcc 3.3.x for HPPA
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 10 Aug 2003 17:59:59 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 10 12:59:57 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from gsyprf11.external.hp.com [192.6.38.61]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 19luU1-0003qS-00; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 12:59:57 -0500
Received: by gsyprf11.external.hp.com (Postfix, from userid 1001)
id 8FD5D57D49; Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:59:55 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Grant Grundler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xlibs: libXt.so needs to be built with gcc 3.3.x for HPPA
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.20
Date: Sun, 10 Aug 2003 10:59:55 -0700
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0
tests=BAYES_10,HAS_PACKAGE
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_07_20
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
Package: xlibs
Version: 4.2.1-6
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
libXt.so/testing has been broken for hppa for quite some time.
Rebuilding libXt.so with gcc 3.3.x "fixes" the problem.
First email on the topic at:
http://lists.parisc-linux.org/pipermail/parisc-linux/2003-March/019622.html
Error message is "Unresolved inheritance operation" with gv, xdvi,
xpdf, xkeycaps, et al.
I was hoping for one of two results:
o promote xlibs-4.2.1-9/unstable to "testing"
(assumes -9 is built with gcc 3.3.1)
o bin upload the entire xfree86 4.2.1-6 for hppa built with gcc 3.3.1
I hadn't filed a bug report before thinking in a month or so a new
xfree86 would get uploaded and promoted to testing. Hasn't happened
yet (4 monthes later).
This bug is producible on B180, C3000, 32 and 64-bit kernels.
Most recently, James Bottomley (linux-scsi maintainer) ran into
this when preparing a B180 for HP World to use to present his talk.
He rebuilt xfree86-4.2.1-9 and installed the xlibs*hppa.deb with success.
thanks,
grant
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: hppa
Kernel: Linux gsyprf11.external.hp.com 2.4.21-pa6 #23 Mon Jul 14 23:11:39 PDT 2003
parisc64
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xlibs depends on:
ii libc6 2.3.1-16 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libfreetype6 2.1.4-4 FreeType 2 font engine, shared lib
ii xfree86-common 4.2.1-6 X Window System (XFree86) infrastr
-- no debconf information
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 204844-done) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2003 00:56:28 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Sep 27 19:56:25 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A3PrM-0005io-00; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:56:24 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id E77CE640DE; Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:56:23 -0500 (EST)
Date: Sat, 27 Sep 2003 19:56:23 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#204844: xlibs: libXt.so needs to be built with gcc 3.3.x for HPPA
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="WR+jf/RUebEcofwt"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.7 required=4.0
tests=EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--WR+jf/RUebEcofwt
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:57:00PM -0600, Grant Grundler wrote:
> On Wed, Aug 27, 2003 at 09:27:45PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> ...
> > My feeling is that our efforts are best spent on getting a newer 4.2.1
> > package into testing at this point.
>=20
> Agreed.
>=20
> I've placed a full set of "hand crafted" 4.2.1-9 hppa debs on:
> http://gsyprf11.external.hp.com/hppa/xfree86-4.2.1-9/
>=20
> Built with gcc 3.3.1 and current "testing" binutils.
> Works For Me (tm).
>=20
> These are built by hacking the Makefile "world" target to not rebuild
> everything from scratch and iteratively fix up the two problems by hand.
> source/build tree is intact on gsyprf11 in case someone wants a copy.
xfree86 4.2.1-11 entered Debian testing on Friday.
Closing this report.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | Freedom is kind of a hobby with me,
Debian GNU/Linux | and I have disposable income that
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | I'll spend to find out how to get
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | people more of it. -- Penn Jillette
--WR+jf/RUebEcofwt
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj92MbcACgkQ6kxmHytGonxsQQCeNb9+/fKQf8xWK0autDVlXoSx
2osAnRYgJnQY0/um1IwXV2VvF3a+VvRm
=4ZCu
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--WR+jf/RUebEcofwt--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
