Your message dated Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:10:48 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line xfree86: wanted: dri-source package to build kernel modules with
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 25 Mar 2002 11:49:05 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Mar 25 05:49:05 2002
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from ns1.alcove-solutions.com (smtp-out.fr.alcove.com) [212.155.209.139]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 16pSyH-0000kk-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 05:49:05 -0600
Received: from kasba.alcove-fr ([10.16.10.14])
by smtp-out.fr.alcove.com with esmtp (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16pSyF-0005ma-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:49:03 +0100
Received: from ydirson by kasba.alcove-fr with local (Exim 3.12 #1 (Debian))
id 16pSyF-0007A9-00; Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:49:03 +0100
Date: Mon, 25 Mar 2002 12:49:03 +0100
From: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: please provide some dri-source package
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.25i
X-Reportbug-Version: 0.54.1
Sender: Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Package: xfree86
Version: 4.1.0-14
Severity: wishlist
The Xfree source is said to contain the source for kernel drm modules
matching the Xfree dri modules. It would be great to have those in a
package, just as other kernel modules are shipped - looks like current
practice is to just install the tgz in /usr/src/modules/
--
Yann Dirson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.alcove.com/
Technical support manager Responsable de l'assistance technique
Senior Free-Software Consultant Consultant senior en Logiciels Libres
Debian developer ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) Développeur Debian
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 139817-done) by bugs.debian.org; 26 Sep 2003 16:11:57 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Sep 26 11:10:49 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp065-026-182-085.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [65.26.182.85]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1A2vBB-0002Cz-00; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:10:49 -0500
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 7AE556412F; Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:10:48 -0500 (EST)
Date: Fri, 26 Sep 2003 11:10:48 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: xfree86: wanted: dri-source package to build kernel modules with
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3"
Content-Disposition: inline
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0
tests=none
version=2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.53-bugs.debian.org_2003_9_21
(1.174.2.15-2003-03-30-exp)
--aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
I'm tagging this bug wontfix and closing it, and am reverting the
changes in the XFree86 4.3.0 experimental packages that provide it.
My reasons are:
* The packaging was sloppily implemented and recently broken by the
implementer (as can be seen in 4.3.0-0pre1v2). The person responsible
for it therefore appears to no longer have time to maintain it
properly. This factor combines with the following.
* There is no upstream support for installing the kernel module sources
onto the system (i.e., "make install" completely ignores these files).
We have to kludge our own solution, which is prone to errors (see
above).
* The DRI modules in recent versions of the Linux 2.4 kernel are at
least as up to date as the sources in XFree86 4.3.0 (or so I am told).
* XFree86 upstream uses an external source for the Linux kernel DRI
modules anyway, so really all you're getting from this package is a
snapshot, which given the slow pace of XFree86 releases combined with
the slow pace of Debian packaging of those releases, means the kernel
module sources provided will be quite out of date, more often than
not.
For all of the above reasons, I do not think the best course of action
is to provide a DRI kernel modules source-code package from the xfree86
Debian source package.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | I am sorry, but what you have
Debian GNU/Linux | mistaken for malicious intent is
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | nothing more than sheer
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | incompetence! -- J. L. Rizzo II
--aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.3 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj90ZQgACgkQ6kxmHytGonz6RQCgmwtahqjBRiMbnA+ZE6UKdXv9
NaoAoIEqzABPyekAdYthSMByk9QQmzxI
=/uJg
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--aziWXe2aaRGlkyg3--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
