On Sat, Aug 09, 2003 at 10:50:43AM -0400, Joey Hess wrote: > Sven Luther wrote: > > It is not nice, i suppose that it is a debhelper bug then, which should > > take only the strongest of the two dependencies or something. > > dpkg-shlibdeps is not in debhelper.
But is called by dh_shlibdeps. But i stand corrected, it is a bug in dpkg-dev then, right ? Altough a minor one. Friendly, Sven Luther -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
