severity 183312 important
retitle 183312 xbase-clients: [xman] buffer overflow in MANPATH handling
thanks

Colin makes a good point; I am therefore downgrading the severity of
this bug.

----- Forwarded message from Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> -----

From: Colin Watson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug#183312: xbase-clients: Buffer overflow in "xman"
Date: Sat, 15 Mar 2003 11:51:26 -0600
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.2.5i
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-39.1 required=4.0
        tests=DEBIAN_BTS_BUG,EMAIL_ATTRIBUTION,IN_REP_TO,
              QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,REPLY_WITH_QUOTES,RESENT_TO,
              USER_AGENT_MUTT,X_LOOP
        autolearn=ham   version=2.50

On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:05:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:34:27PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote:
> > I'm working on a patch for this. The xman code is riddled with static
> > buffers.
> 
> Great, thank you.  I'll gladly accept it as soon as it's ready.

I'm still on this, vacation notwithstanding; sorry for the delay.

Can I suggest that this bug should be downgraded in the meantime? xman
is not setuid and not a network service, so there's no reason why a
segfault there should be considered a security problem. Exploiting one's
own account is not interesting. :)

-- 
Colin Watson                                  [EMAIL PROTECTED]


----- End forwarded message -----

-- 
G. Branden Robinson                |    Religion is regarded by the common
Debian GNU/Linux                   |    people as true, by the wise as
[EMAIL PROTECTED]                 |    false, and by the rulers as useful.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ |    -- Lucius Annaeus Seneca

Attachment: pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to