On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 12:05:05PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 04, 2003 at 03:34:27PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > > I'm working on a patch for this. The xman code is riddled with static > > buffers. > > Great, thank you. I'll gladly accept it as soon as it's ready.
I'm still on this, vacation notwithstanding; sorry for the delay. Can I suggest that this bug should be downgraded in the meantime? xman is not setuid and not a network service, so there's no reason why a segfault there should be considered a security problem. Exploiting one's own account is not interesting. :) -- Colin Watson [EMAIL PROTECTED] -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
