On Don, 2003-02-27 at 21:48, Daniel Burrows wrote: > On Thu, Feb 27, 2003 at 06:51:02PM +0100, Michel Dänzer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was > heard to say: > > On Don, 2003-02-27 at 13:26, Daniel Burrows wrote: > > > > > > It seems like this happens because /proc/fb exists, and > > > [ -n "$(cat /proc/fb)" ] fails. On my computer, /proc/fb is a zero-byte > > > file, which is probably why the test fails: > > > > > > torrent.burrows.local:~> wc -c /proc/fb > > > 0 /proc/fb > > > > Probably not: > > > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wc -c /proc/fb ~ > > 0 /proc/fb > > [EMAIL PROTECTED]> cat /proc/fb ~ > > 0 M9 Lf > > My, that's messed up..anyway, maybe I should have used the example > where I tested [ -n $(cat /proc/fb) ] and it failed. How's this? > torrent:~> cat /proc/fb > torrent:~> od /proc/fb > 0000000 > torrent:~> cat /proc/fb | wc -c > 0
Weird. Anyway, the test certainly isn't adequate because Option "UseFBDev" doesn't work with generic framebuffer devices like vesafb, OFfb, ... -- Earthling Michel Dänzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
