Your message dated Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:04:08 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#178853: Acknowledgement (xserver-xfree86: piss-tiny description
update)
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2003 00:52:13 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 28 18:52:13 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au [203.28.240.16] (postfix)
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18dgSb-0004fY-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 18:52:13 -0600
Received: by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 105)
id B170B18020; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:52:11 +1100 (EST)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68E251801F
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:52:10 +1100 (EST)
Received: from roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au
[203.28.240.3])
by epistula.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id DBFA31801D
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:52:06 +1100 (EST)
Received: by roger.trinity.unimelb.edu.au (Postfix, from userid 1280)
id 3DAD717E45; Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:52:06 +1100 (EST)
Date: Wed, 29 Jan 2003 11:52:06 +1100
From: Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: xserver-xfree86: piss-tiny description update
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-GnuPG-Key: 3CED7EFD
X-Virus-Scanned: by AMaViS snapshot-20020316
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-7.7 required=5.0
tests=PGP_SIGNATURE_2,SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,
USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: xserver-xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Severity: wishlist
Justification: if there was any lower severity, I'd set it to that
Quoting from its description:
The XFree86 server supports most modern graphics hardware from most vendor=
s,
and supersedes most version 3.x XFree86 X servers. See
<http://www.xfree86.org/4.1.0/Status.html> for information on its support =
for
your particular hardware.
Clearly, s/4\.1\.0/4.2.0/. Please don't get the Sodomotron.
--=20
Daniel Stone <[EMAIL PROTECTED]=
u.au>
Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.7 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE+NyW2cPClnTztfv0RAhnRAJ4mRc69CA5gbqzBImQzF7FUoDWW7QCfYMLZ
F7lj4a/MP48O6PRjlb7WAk4=
=WVWH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--k+w/mQv8wyuph6w0--
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 178853-done) by bugs.debian.org; 29 Jan 2003 04:04:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 28 22:04:09 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18djSL-0002fe-00; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 22:04:09 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 77D3A640AC; Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:04:08 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Jan 2003 23:04:08 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#178853: Acknowledgement (xserver-xfree86: piss-tiny description
update)
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="C94crkcyjafcjHxo"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Copies-To: nobody
X-No-CC: I subscribe to this list; do not CC me on replies.
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.3i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-16.5 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_02_03,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--C94crkcyjafcjHxo
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Wed, Jan 29, 2003 at 12:10:41PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 28, 2003 at 07:03:03PM -0600, Debian Bug Tracking System scra=
wled:
> > Thank you for the problem report you have sent regarding Debian.
> > This is an automatically generated reply, to let you know your message =
has
> > been received. It is being forwarded to the developers mailing list for
> > their attention; they will reply in due course.
> >
> > [...]
>=20
> I of course meant http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status.html, not 4.2.0.
>=20
> I can't believe I made a mistake in a bug that simple. Please don't hurt
> me, nice Mr. XFree86 Maintainer.
This bug report is also bogus.
% dpkg -s xserver-xfree86
Package: xserver-xfree86
Status: install ok installed
Priority: optional
Section: x11
Installed-Size: 11820
Maintainer: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: xfree86
Version: 4.2.1-5
Replaces: xserver-common (<< 4.0), libxfont-xtt
Provides: xserver
Depends: debconf (>> 0.5), xserver-common (>=3D 4.1.0-10), libc6 (>=3D 2.3.=
1-1), zlib1g (>=3D 1:1.1.4)
Suggests: discover, mdetect, read-edid
Conflicts: libxfont-xtt
Description: the XFree86 X server
The XFree86 X server is an X server for several architectures and operating
systems; its architecture was completely redesigned for the 4.0 release, a=
nd
features a loadable module system in which required modules are loaded on
demand by a single server binary as opposed to the video card-specific X
servers of the 3.x release.
.
The XFree86 server supports most modern graphics hardware from most vendor=
s,
and supersedes most version 3.x XFree86 X servers. See
<http://www.xfree86.org/4.2.1/Status.html> for information on its support =
for
your particular hardware.
.
If the discover, mdetect and read-edid packages are installed, the debconf
scripts in this package will use them to attempt automatic configuration
of the X server based on your information returned by your video card,
mouse, and monitor.
.
Note that on the HP-PA, MIPS, and SuperH architectures, the server's
loadable module support is not present, and therefore the XFree86 server i=
s a
(very large) single binary.
Closing this spurious report. Please don't falsify the Version: header
of your bug reports.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | Kissing girls is a goodness. It is
Debian GNU/Linux | a growing closer. It beats the
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | hell out of card games.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
--C94crkcyjafcjHxo
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj43UrgACgkQ6kxmHytGonzNcQCfbbGjnLESRkoUCfoKRx2j9nBA
6q4AnidCCjPVqr5cFyuFr2pX+JETXHFx
=DkuY
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--C94crkcyjafcjHxo--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
