Your message dated Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:22:50 -0500
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#175618: xdm fails to start X
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2003 01:39:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Jan 06 19:39:30 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from fort-point-station.mit.edu [18.7.7.76]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18ViiI-0001P0-00; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 19:39:30 -0600
Received: from central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu
(CENTRAL-CITY-CARRIER-STATION.MIT.EDU [18.7.7.72])
by fort-point-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA03498
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:39:30 -0500 (EST)
Received: from melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (MELBOURNE-CITY-STREET.MIT.EDU
[18.7.21.86])
by central-city-carrier-station.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA23388;
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:39:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from tess-turbo (STRATTON-THREE-SEVENTY-SIX.MIT.EDU [18.187.6.121])
by melbourne-city-street.mit.edu (8.9.2/8.9.2) with ESMTP id UAA20706;
Mon, 6 Jan 2003 20:39:29 -0500 (EST)
Received: from alex by tess-turbo with local (Exim 3.36 #1 (Debian))
id 18ViiG-0001Jh-00; Mon, 06 Jan 2003 20:39:28 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Alex Coventry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: xdm fails to start X
X-Mailer: reportbug 2.10
Date: Mon, 06 Jan 2003 20:39:28 -0500
Message-Id: <E18ViiG-0001Jh-00@tess-turbo>
Sender: Alex Coventry <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.6 required=5.0
tests=SPAM_PHRASE_00_01
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
Package: xdm
Version: 4.2.1-4
Severity: grave
Justification: renders package unusable
the init.d xdm script fails to start X. "xdm" from the command line
also fails to start X. i can start it just fine with "startx", though.
hope this helps.
alex.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
Architecture: powerpc
Kernel: Linux tess-turbo 2.4.18-newpmac #1 Thu Mar 14 22:44:49 EST 2002 ppc
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages xdm depends on:
ii cpp 2:2.95.4-17 The GNU C preprocessor.
ii debconf 1.2.21 Debian configuration management sy
ii libc6 2.3.1-9 GNU C Library: Shared libraries an
ii libpam0g 0.76-9 Pluggable Authentication Modules l
ii libxaw7 4.2.1-4 X Athena widget set library
ii xbase-clients 4.2.1-4 miscellaneous X clients
ii xlibs 4.2.1-4 X Window System client libraries
-- debconf information:
xdm/stop_running_server_with_children: false
xdm/daemon_name: /usr/bin/X11/xdm
shared/default-x-display-manager: xdm
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 175618-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 Jan 2003 19:22:55 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Jan 07 13:22:55 2003
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from dhcp16621067.indy.rr.com (redwald.deadbeast.net) [24.166.21.67]
by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.12 1 (Debian))
id 18VzJO-00070d-00; Tue, 07 Jan 2003 13:22:54 -0600
Received: by redwald.deadbeast.net (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id A10F764145; Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:22:50 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 7 Jan 2003 14:22:50 -0500
From: Branden Robinson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#175618: xdm fails to start X
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <E18ViiG-0001Jh-00@tess-turbo>
<[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-15.2 required=5.0
tests=IN_REP_TO,PGP_SIGNATURE_2,QUOTED_EMAIL_TEXT,REFERENCES,
SPAM_PHRASE_00_01,USER_AGENT,USER_AGENT_MUTT
version=2.41
X-Spam-Level:
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Jan 07, 2003 at 11:54:14AM -0500, Alex Coventry wrote:
> below is the output of the commands you suggested, after attempting to
> run xdm again. there are no processes with the name "xdm", and the
> contents of the Xservers file looks sane. the modification time on that
> file is from Dec 8 last year. between then and last night, when i ran
> into this problem, the machine has been rebooted and successfully
> restarted xdm.
Sounds like some sort of transient problem specific to your machine.
Closing this bug.
> to me it looks like the xdm package is rendered unusable by xdm failing
> to start X, and that matched the "grave" severity option in the list
> provided by reportbug. what bug severity would you suggest?
When the report is this vague and unreproducible, "important" at worst.
If you can reproduce or isolate the cause of this problem, please
re-file.
--=20
G. Branden Robinson | "I came, I saw, she conquered."
Debian GNU/Linux | The original Latin seems to have
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | been garbled.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Robert Heinlein
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iEYEARECAAYFAj4bKQoACgkQ6kxmHytGonyb8ACfS55PWJbuh4CxXzdUzQOsoVbQ
7rIAnAmj1rxN98WNMtkGpyoJYlQ0Ofuf
=gabZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--ZGiS0Q5IWpPtfppv--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
