On Sat, Apr 27, 2002 at 06:09:50PM -0500, Branden Robinson wrote: > The part that is frustrating is this: > > (**) R128(0): Using framebuffer device > (II) Loading sub module "fbdevhw" > (II) LoadModule: "fbdevhw" > (II) Loading /live/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a > (II) Module fbdevhw: vendor="The XFree86 Project" > compiled for 4.1.0.1, module version = 0.0.2 > ABI class: XFree86 Video Driver, version 0.4 > (II) UnloadModule: "ati" > (II) UnloadModule: "fbdevhw" > (II) Unloading /live/lib/modules/linux/libfbdevhw.a > (II) UnloadModule: "vgahw" > (II) Unloading /live/lib/modules/libvgahw.a > (II) UnloadModule: "r128" > (II) Unloading /live/lib/modules/drivers/r128_drv.o > (EE) Screen(s) found, but none have a usable configuration. > > All of a sudden, *something* is deciding it's time to bail out. It looks like > the fbdevhw module. But no level of verbosity is explaining. On a normal > startup, right after the fbdevhw module talks about itself, R128(0) speaks up > and claims the ATI Rage 128 LF device. > > I don't understand the internals of > xc/programs/Xserver/hw/xfree86/fbdevhw/fbdevhw.c to speculate on what's > going on. Is there a place where some xf86DrvMsg()s could be added to > help diagnose this apparent decision by the module to bail out??
Problem solved. It was caused by a missing /dev/fb0 file. This, of course, exists in a normal installation but was missing from the instalelr environment. Maybe something (fbdevhw.c or r128_driver.c, I'm not sure which) should complain if /dev/fb0 cannot be opened? -- G. Branden Robinson | If a man ate a pound of pasta and a Debian GNU/Linux | pound of antipasto, would they [EMAIL PROTECTED] | cancel out, leaving him still http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | hungry? -- Scott Adams
msg03562/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
