[debian-arm readers, please keep debian-x in the thread]
On Wed, Aug 29, 2001 at 11:46:42AM -0400, Adam C Powell IV wrote:
> It worked! Failed the manifest check of course, but the diff looked
> kosher (a few cs -> cz and sk key map moves, lots of font stuff, man
> pages moved from /usr/share/man to /usr/X11R6/man, nothing of any
> consequence to the binary-arch packages). So I touched
> debian/stampdir/install (since the manifest check ends that target), and
> am making binary-arch now, will genchanges and dupload when it's done.
> Oh- and will test it and see whether it works! But since 4.0.3 is
> broken, maybe it's not such a bad thing to upload 4.1.0 either way? :-\
Please don't upload official .debs that are the result of a kludged
process like this. It makes me really nervous.
I'd be happy to host such .debs at the X Strike Force, however, until we
have arm packages that build correctly from start to finish.
> Relevant files:
> http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/MANIFEST.arm.4.1.0-2
> http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-2.build-install.log
> and coming soon (an hour or two?):
> http://lyre.mit.edu/~powell/debs/xfree86_4.1.0-2.binary-arch.log
Thanks! I'll check this stuff out.
--
G. Branden Robinson | We either learn from history or,
Debian GNU/Linux | uh, well, something bad will
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | happen.
http://people.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Bob Church
PGP signature
