Hello folks,
I have made some proposed revisions to Debian X policy. None of them
should come as a surprise to readers of this mailing list.
Please check out the debian-policy mailing list. I'd appreciate discussion
of these proposals (remember to mail the bugs under which they were filed,
not the debian-policy mailing list).
You can also find these proposals at the following URL's:
http://bugs.debian.org/91249
http://bugs.debian.org/91252
http://bugs.debian.org/91257
http://bugs.debian.org/91259
http://bugs.debian.org/91260
http://bugs.debian.org/91261
I still need seconds for 91252, 91257, and 91261.
Here are the one-line summaries:
91249 [PROPOSED] bring X support policy into line with must/should/may usage
91252 [PROPOSED] enhanced x-terminal-emulator policy, second try
91257 [PROPOSED] changes to X font policy
91259 [PROPOSED] minor changes to app-defaults policy
91260 [PROPOSED] reclarifying the policy about X and the FHS
91261 [PROPOSED] modernized rewording of X/Motif policy
--
G. Branden Robinson |
Debian GNU/Linux | If existence exists,
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | why create a creator?
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ |
PGP signature
