>That's a problem because XFree86 has its own module loader for portability of >the modules. Isn't there a way to force the compiler to include such functions >statically or something? The compiler can't do this on its own. You could pass the objects through `ld -r' to resolve references to functions in libc and libgcc, I guess. This problem occurs on ARM too, because even integer division involves a call to a function in libgcc. p. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Branden Robinson
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Daniel Jacobowitz
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Branden Robinson
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status djw
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Paul Slootman
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Christian T. Steigies
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Philip Blundell
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Philip Blundell
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Tor Slettnes
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Tor Slettnes
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Christian T. Steigies
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Christian T. Steigies
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Christian T. Steigies
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Christian T. Steigies
- Re: XFree86 4.0.2 status Michel Dänzer