Seth Arnold wrote:
> Compared against Utah, at least the last time I looked at it, this is
> really pretty quick and easy. Whether or not the features supported by
> Utah are imporant enough to justify the work involved with getting it to
> go is entirely dependent upon the applications one needs to run. For me,
> I never missed the features. For mongoose (terry?), he obviously misses
> the features of Utah, but not enough to ensure they wouldn't be
> overwritten.
So, it is your stance that you will not support cards without DRI
drivers - and only support 3d cards by their DRI drivers only? People
shouldn't be artificial limited like that from my view.
If this was about quick and easy and using drivers that weren't fully
functional, then I could be running NT. This is about a policy change
that wasn't well thought. Some people will need utah for some time, and
not allowing new installs of xservers to support utah seems to
artifically impose huge hurtles for users and shops alike.
cheers,
Terry
--
---------------------------------------------------
| GooseEgg http://gooseegg.sourceforge.net |
| QuakeForge http://www.quakeforge.net |
| Personal http://www.westga.edu/~stu7440 |
| |
| Death is running Debian GNU/Linux |
---------------------------------------------------
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
