On Thu, Sep 07, 2000 at 10:34:34AM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> is this intentional:
Yes.
>
> Package: xlibs-dev
> Version: 4.0.1-0phase2v1
> Depends: xlibs, libc6-dev
> Provides: libxpm4-dev, xmanpages
> Replaces: xbase (<< 3.3.2.3a-2), xdevel, xpm4g-dev, xmanpages, xlib6g-dev,
>xlib6g-static
>
> note there's no Provides: xlib6-dev
It's not needed.
> and a side question, why the name change? (there's no README, is
> there? and the changelog doesn't say)
You mean this changelog?
xfree86 (4.0.1-0phase2v1) unstable; urgency=low
* Using 4.0.1c.
* DO NOT FILE BUGS AGAINST THIS PACKAGE. IT HAS NOT BEEN OFFICIALLY
RELEASED.
* IF YOU ARE NOT AN X WINDOW SYSTEM BRAINIAC, YOU SHOULD JUST WAIT FOR
OFFICIAL XFREE86 DEBIAN PACKAGES TO BE UPLOADED TO UNSTABLE.
* THINGS NOT YET ACTIVATED IN THIS RELEASE:
+ DRI support for 3Dfx cards; needs libglide3, which is not yet ready
as a Debian package
+ most of the X specification documents; some of them are riddled with
groff errors and won't build
* new upstream version (4.0 was not packaged)
(Closes: #60137,42943)
* everything back into one source package
* xlib6g has been renamed to xlibs; this is necessary because
libXaw.so.6, previously contained in xlib6g, is now in its own package
(libxaw6). If xlib6g retained its old name, partial upgrades would be
broken, since potato-era packages compiled against libXaw 6 would
expect it to be present on a system with xlib6g installed. So, the new
X library conglomeration package is now called xlibs, and xlib6g will
be maintained externally as a pseudopackage which depends on xlibs and
libxaw6. Thanks to Joey Hess for bringing this problem to my
attention. (As a bonus, we get to drop the nasty old "g" artifact --
woohoo!)
* Not all the Debian patches from 3.3.6 have been migrated forward yet.
[...]
--
G. Branden Robinson | <joeyh> oh my, it's a UP P III.
Debian GNU/Linux | <doogie> dos it.
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | * joeyh runs dselect
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | <Overfiend> that ought to be sufficient :)
PGP signature