On Sun, Aug 13, 2000 at 10:43:00PM +0200, Marcelo E. Magallon wrote:
> xlibgl1's shlibs says:
>
> libGL 1 xlibgl1 (>= 4.0.1-0)
> libOSMesa 3 xlibgl1 (>= 4.0.1-0)
>
> is there a reason for that? (ignore the libOSMesa line -- it's there
> for completeness) It should be simply libgl1. If a program /really/
> depends on the OpenGL implementation in Xfree86 4.0, it's either
> broken or has a very specific need. In the later case, it should
> declare the dependency by itself.
I just tossed that in because I needed a shlibs line.
What, specifically, do you suggest, again? Please show me the exact format
so I don't screw it up. :)
Also, I'm starting to think I need to pull libOSMesa into its own package,
because the virtual package libgl1 can only be expected to provide libGL,
not libGLU, libOSMesa, or anything else.
--
G. Branden Robinson | It's not a matter of alienating authors.
Debian GNU/Linux | They have every right to license their
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | software however we like.
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Craig Sanders, in debian-devel
PGP signature
