You are one of the most hysterically panicky people I have ever met.
First of all, I cannot understand why you CC'ed Stephen Moraco in your
message, since he doesn't, AIUI, have much to do with your concerns.
On Mon, Jul 17, 2000 at 11:05:49AM +0200, Sven LUTHER wrote:
> > mesa James Treacy I talked to him; because of GGI and stuff,
> > Mesa will continue to be maintained
> > independently of X, however X will provide
> > its own Mesa/GL implementation in xlibgl1
> > (which will provide libgl1) and xlibgl-dev
>
> huh ???
>
> will ggi-mesa and x-mesa be able to be installed simoultanouesly or will they
> conflict ?
Well, they'll probably have to confict. When two packages both provide the
same virtual package, that's typically what you get. Especially in this
case, as both packages will have to install a thing called
/usr/lib/libGL.so.1.2.
> i don't know, but it seems to me that accelerated mesa for X as well as the
> remaining DRI stuff is one of the most advertissed part of the XF4 release
> (well together with the proprietary binary drivers from nvidia and the like,
> how do you plan to manage those, branden ?)
Well, I'm sure I'll figure something out, Sven. Instead of freaking out,
either calm down and contribute, or be quiet.
--
G. Branden Robinson | Somebody once asked me if I thought sex
Debian GNU/Linux | was dirty. I said, "It is if you're
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | doing it right."
http://www.debian.org/~branden/ | -- Woody Allen
PGP signature
