>>>>> On Thu, 19 Feb 2026 10:29:42 +0000, "Jonathan Dowland" <[email protected]>
>>>>> said:
> However moving away from recursive-make would be a pretty major
> undertaking, which would be of limited utility depending on whether it
> would be appreciated upstream in the medium-term, prior to moving to
> Hugo, and how long that medium term might be. What do you think?
I would not invest any time in this.
I do not see any problem in using recursive-make, and the build
time of the webwml was improved in the last years.
> Are there any other pain points/nits with the current harness that fixes
> for which would be welcome and worthwhile?
I do not see any pain points besides that we want (and will) move from
webwml to hugo.
--
best regards Thomas
