On Mon Mar 24, 2025 at 1:51 PM CET, Thomas Lange wrote: >>>>>> On Mon, 24 Mar 2025 12:39:10 +0000, Steve McIntyre <st...@einval.com> >>>>>> said: > > > Why remove documentation on what has been considered and done in the > > web team? What harm are those pages causing? > To improve the ratio between good and outdated content.
the meta-problem here is: we have no (rough) consensus on what the wiki is *for* is it for internal team docs? then keeping KallesDesign could indeed be useful as a reference to future contributors. is it for end-user documentation that is meant to be kept up to date? then KallesDesign is not. the current (sorry, imho) state of the wiki suggests that the answer is: for pretty much *anything* remotely Debian related, including for archiving information of purely historical interest, and we would rather have low quality information (where freshness is one aspect of quality) than no information at all.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
