Hello, On Mon 15 Apr 2024 at 09:59am GMT, Holger Levsen wrote:
> On Sun, Apr 14, 2024 at 08:43:51PM +0800, Sean Whitton wrote: >> ... but if dev-ref is already shipping both, maybe singlepage is indeed >> usable these days ... > > I think it is. > >> > Could the Policy Editors team check, if everything is fine now, and if >> > this should be published again? >> > At least there is still an issue with the footnotes, there are 16 >> > occurrences >> > of #id1 for example... (search for "[1]" in policy-1.html). >> Hrm. That seems like a pretty serious problem :\ > > I wouldnt call it serious. annoying yes, maybe. > >> Holger L., did you know about this issue? >> Did you decide it was worth publishing anyway? > > yes. > > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/pkgs.en.html#how-could-installing-a-package-into-testing-possibly-break-other-packages > or (single page) > https://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/developers-reference/developers-reference.en.html#how-could-installing-a-package-into-testing-possibly-break-other-packages > both show four footnotes, right where they belong, it's just that > each foot note is numbered and that [1] or [2] or whatever is > a link, pointing to a wrong place. > > I agree it's a bug, but I do think it's a pretty harmless one. Thanks. I'd be grateful for some feedback from other regular Policy contributors. -- Sean Whitton
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
