On Mon, 2023-10-23 at 20:44 +0900, Jing Luo wrote: > Hello Adam, > > First of all, I would like to thank the mirror team for all the hard > work. > > On 2023-10-21 02:46, Adam D. Barratt wrote: > > Note that Mirrors.masterlist.in is not used verbatim by any part of > > the > > website. Rather, the Mirror Team's status monitoring tools (see > > e.g. > > https://mirror-master.debian.org/status/mirror-status.html ) > > generate a > > filtered list containing those mirrors which are considered to be > > currently "good enough" (i.e. have managed to stay up-to-date for > > long > > enough), so not all mirrors in the .in file will appear in the > > results. > > I see. Is this information publicly available on www.d.o or gitlab?
Which information? > Since there is a generated version of Mirrors.masterlist and it > doesn't appears to be publicly accessible, and the mirror team has > its own standard, there is really no way for any "outsider" to know > if the lists on the website is really good. It is publicly accessible. The generated file is in https://mirror-master.debian.org/status/ (which you can verify in the webwml repository is where the website downloads it from), and the status of each mirror can be checked using the URL from my previous mail. > However, I do find one that should be included: debian.cs.nycu.edu.tw looks up to date and should be on the debian- > cd list. It's up-to-date now, but as you can see from https://mirror-master.debian.org/status/mirror-info/debian.cs.nycu.edu.tw.html , it's been having some issues recently. The "score" column needs to be at least 50 for it to be included. > For debian-ports, linux.purple-cat.net is also up to date, but why is > it not on the debian-ports list? Do you not accept new ports mirror? That's in the generated Masterlist file, and has Ports-* fields, so that might be one for the web team to look at, I think. Regards, Adam
