Your message dated Fri, 20 Oct 2023 20:47:52 +0200 with message-id <25906.52056.998096.684...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #856691, regarding Minor tweaks to webpages about the bug-tracking system to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 856691: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=856691 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: www.debian.org Severity: minor Can the following 3 things be clarified on the website: * The item in the e-mails below about X-Debbugs-No-Ack & other pseudo-headers. * On https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer there is a Table-of-Contents entry that says: "Recording that you have passed on a bug report". This can sound like "pass" in the Python programming language, i.e., "ignored." Maybe this can be reworded like "Recording that you have notified someone else of a bug report". * On https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting , about 2/3 of the way down, it says "If wish to report" instead of "If you wish to report". Thanks. -------- Original Message -------- Subject: Re: No-Ack pseudo-header didn't seem to work From: d...@debian.org To: dg1727 <dg1...@protonmail.com> ow...@bugs.debian.org <ow...@bugs.debian.org> On Fri, 03 Mar 2017, dg1727 wrote: > https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=854326#10 has an > X-Debbugs-No-Ack pseudo-header, but I got an ack e-mail anyway. > > https://www.debian.org/Bugs/Reporting says "the contents of this > header do not matter". The psuedoheader parsing code is a bit different from the header parsing code, and requires that there is a content after the colon. [This limitation doesn't exist for the headers, though.] So... the content doesn't matter, but pseudoheaders need content. -- Don Armstrong https://www.donarmstrong.com
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---I've fixed the third of your things. The other things do not seem to be that important, because noone else complained about this. IMO there's no need to fix those, so closing. -- regards Thomas
--- End Message ---
