Your message dated Sat, 14 Oct 2023 20:13:56 +0200 with message-id <25898.55908.488766.252...@cs.uni-koeln.de> and subject line closing has caused the Debian Bug report #830962, regarding www.debian.org: automatically set the state of ports based on the Debian archives to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with. If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith. (NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org immediately.) -- 830962: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=830962 Debian Bug Tracking System Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---Package: www.debian.org Severity: wishlist The current Debian ports page lists all ports along with their state. That state is maintained manually but could easily be maintained automatically based on the state of the main archive, the ports archive and the obsolete releases archive for the various suites. The only issue would be that some ports are in neither archive so they would need to be marked as external. The list of states that ports can be in are: released: available in currently supported releases discontinued: was in a previous release but not in any supported release, nor in ports reviving: was in a previous release but not in any supported release, still exists in ports replaced: discontinued and there is a replacement set in progress: only in the ports archive external: only in an external archive dead: only ever in the ports archive or external https://www.debian.org/ports/ https://anonscm.debian.org/viewvc/webwml/webwml/english/ports/index.wml -- bye, pabs https://wiki.debian.org/PaulWise
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---Hi, the ports page was improved a week ago and now more cleary states when a port was added or dropped and the current state. Even this info is added manually, I think that's sufficient. You say "it could easily be maintained automatically based on the state of the main archive" but this was not implemented since many years. Therefore closing. -- regards Thomas
--- End Message ---