On Wed 30 May 2018 at 15:53:31 +0000, Holger Levsen wrote: > On Wed, May 30, 2018 at 04:08:00PM +0100, Steve McIntyre wrote: > > >"Account creation *delayed*: to prevent spam, this wiki requires additional > > >information from some people. Please contact w...@debian.org and describe > > >what you want to do in the wiki. To repeat: please mail us if you need > > >an account." > > > > > >(I replaced "failed" with "delayed" and add the last sentence.) > > > > ACK. I think I prefer "denied" in this case - I'd worry that some > > people might mis-read "delayed" to suggest it'll work if they just > > wait. > > I think that would have a similar effected as "failed". How about: > > "Account creation *delayed*: to prevent spam, this wiki requires additional > information from some people. Please contact w...@debian.org and describe > what you want to do in the wiki. You *must* mail us if you need an account. > If you don't mail us, no account will be created."
I have no idea what stress the wiki is under from people who wish to degrade its usability. I also have no idea how hard it is to prevent this happening or how effective the measures in place succeed in preventing it. But regarding the present message sent to unsuccessful joiners: 1. Account creation failed: Looks straightforward. 2. To prevent spam, this wiki requires additional information from some people. Reason given. What to do about it. 3. Please contact w...@debian.org and describe what you want to do in the wiki... Personal, one-to-one assistance given. That is more than you might get elsewhere. How could anyone be confused by this? The request has failed. The user knows why and what to do about it. Any delay is caused by the user not resonding. The message is ok as it is. -- Brian.
