On Wed, 28 Mar 2018 at 01:47:03 +0900, Osamu Aoki wrote:
> >  <define-tag chairman><br>
> > -<spaces><em><gettext 
> > domain="organization">chairman</gettext></em>&nbsp;</define-tag>
> > +<spaces><em><gettext 
> > domain="organization">chair</gettext></em>&nbsp;</define-tag>
> 
> Can't we use neutral term "chairperson" as a tag even though we will
> never see it.

If you're going to rename the tag (and risk breaking something else
that might be relying on it), then I think it would make more sense to
match the content (and the term in the constitution) and use
<define-tag chair>. Renaming it, but to a different gender-neutral term,
seems like the worst of both worlds to me.

    smcv

Reply via email to