Hi, Yes, I think it is a bug. Have you already sent a bug report? If not, I will send it when I have time. (Maybe on weekend)
Cheers, Alex On 28/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux <mehrdadli...@gmail.com> wrote: > OK it is very good thanks > > 1 : you accepted free software can be commercial software > 2 : you seed commercial code is code of commercial software > 3 : free software is kind of software have Four Freedoms > (run,study,redistribute,improve) > > OK > > look at this link > > in Debian web site > https://www.Debian.org/intro/free.en.html > > we have article titled > What Does Free Mean? or What do you mean by Free Software? > > in paragraph 6 part 3 > > write > " > >> Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial >> code >> is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is not >> available. Also, the company may decide to stop supporting the hardware >> you >> use. Many free licenses force the distribution of the source code. This >> protects the user by allowing them to customize the software for their >> needs. >> > " > > i think it must be fix it is wrong “free software” is a matter of liberty, > not price > > why it write commercial code is that you can't fix bugs? > why it write source code is not available? > > i thinks it must be fix and it is wrong > > > thanks for your answers > > > > > > On Tue, Oct 27, 2015 at 6:15 PM, Alex Vong <alexvong1...@gmail.com> wrote: > >> I see what you mean now, thanks for clarification! IMO, commercial >> code is simply code of commercial software. Free code and proprietary >> code can be defined similarly as well. I am showing an counter example >> that RHEL is "made up" of commercial code but is free software at the >> same time. Does this answer your question? >> >> Cheers, >> Alex >> >> On 27/10/2015, Mehrdad Linux <mehrdadli...@gmail.com> wrote: >> > thanks for your answer >> > maybe you don't read my email :D >> > look at title >> > read this paragraph carefully >> > >> > Distribution of source code. One of the problems with most commercial >> code >> > is that you can't fix bugs or customize it since the source code is not >> > available. Also, the company may decide to stop supporting the hardware >> you >> > use. Many free licenses force the distribution of the source code. This >> > protects the user by allowing them to customize the software for their >> > needs. >> > >> > >> > RHEL source code are available and you can fix the bug and ..... >> > >> > i know free software can be Commercial software but what is the >> commercial >> > code? >> > >> > why commercial code can't fix bugs or customize it since the source >> > code >> is >> > not available >> > >> > my question is what is difference between >> > 1 : commercial code >> > 2 : Commercial software >> > 3 : proprietary software >> > >> > i know difference of Commercial software proprietary software my >> > question >> > is what is commercial code? >> > >> >
