Hi, Don Armstrong <d...@debian.org> wrote: > On Thu, 09 Oct 2014, Don Armstrong wrote: > > On Wed, 08 Oct 2014, Robert M. Riches Jr. wrote: > > > It would be helpful if the 'Developer' page would mention the required > > > pseudo-header line(s) and/or refer the reader to the 'Reporting' page. > > > > Probably the latter is the best thing. > > > > I'll patch it to do something along these lines shortly. > > I've gone ahead and made this change.
Now we have this at http://www.debian.org/Bugs/Developer.en.html: Initially, a bug report is submitted by a user as an ordinary mail message to sub...@bugs.debian.org which must include a Package line (see Bug Reporting Instructions for more information). This will then be given a number, acknowledged to the user, and forwarded to debian-bugs-dist. If the submitter included a Package line listing a package with a known maintainer the maintainer will get a copy too. Now above information contradicts itself: 1. a Package line HAS TO BE INCLUDED contra 2. IF a package line WAS INCLUDED, then ... I would propose the following: Reporting Instructions for more information). This will then be given a number, acknowledged to the user, and forwarded to debian-bugs-dist. If - the submitter included a Package line listing a package with a known - maintainer the maintainer will get a copy too. + the Package line contains a package which has a known + maintainer, the maintainer will get a copy too. Holger -- ============================================================ Created with Sylpheed 3.2.0 under the new D E B I A N L I N U X 7 . 0 W H E E Z Y ! Registered Linux User #311290 - https://linuxcounter.net/ ============================================================ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20141025223230.5169c23331ff62fd21b3b...@wansing-online.de
