Your message dated Wed, 16 Oct 2013 18:35:11 +0000
with message-id <e1vwvw7-0000vd...@vasks.debian.org>
and subject line Debian WWW CVS commit by spaillard fixes #683928
has caused the Debian Bug report #683928,
regarding Please include http.debian.net as Type: GeoDNS (?) in
Mirrors.masterlist
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
683928: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=683928
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: mirrors
Severity: normal
Tags: d-i
Hi dear Debian Mirrors Team,
I would like you to consider including http.debian.net as "GeoDNS"
mirror in Mirrors.masterlist. This would allow getting http.debian.net
selected as default mirror in debian-installer (choose-mirror).
The entry would probably be:
Site: http.debian.net
Type: GeoDNS
Archive-architecture: amd64 armel armhf hurd-i386 i386 ia64 kfreebsd-amd64
kfreebsd-i386 mips mipsel powerpc s390 s390x sparc
Airchive-http: /debian/
Backports-http: /debian-backports/
Old-http: /debian-archive/
Archive-upstream: ftp-master.debian.org
IPv6: yes
Maintainer: Raphael Geissert <rgeiss...@debian.org>
Comment: HTTP redirector that uses the geo and network location of the
user and the mirrors, the architecture of the requested files, IP
address family, the availability and freshness of the mirrors, and a
few other things. Details: http://http.debian.net
The list of open questions is at least:
a) Type: GeoDNS - Does it really make sense ?
b) Impact of this change on choose-mirror ? Does it really make
http.debian.net appear first ?
c) Impact of this change on http.debian.net ? (risk of creating HTTP
redirection loops ?)
d) Consensus (within the mirrors team, within -boot) that http.d.n is
superior to cdn.d.n ?
e) status of the integration of http.d.n to http.d.o ?
Thanks for considering, cheers,
OdyX
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
This bug was closed by spaillard in the webwml CVS repository:
http://www.debian.org/devel/website/using_cvs
Note that it might take some time until www.debian.org has been updated.
CVSROOT: /cvs/webwml
Module name: webwml
Changes by: spaillard 13/10/16 18:35:11
Modified files:
indonesian/distrib: index.wml
Log message:
Adding missing include
Modified files:
finnish/ports : index.wml
Log message:
Sync
Modified files:
dutch/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
english/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
french/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
german/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
russian/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
spanish/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
swedish/events/2001: 0126-linuxexpo-amsterdam.wml
Log message:
point internal dead link page
Modified files:
english/mirror : Mirrors.masterlist
Log message:
Add http.debian.net CDN (Closes: #683928)
--- End Message ---
