Bernd Zeimetz schrieb am Freitag, dem 30. August 2013:
> On 08/29/2013 11:48 PM, Filipus Klutiero wrote:
> > Bytemark is already credited in
> > http://www.debian.org/partners/index.en.html but
> > not for hardware donations.
>
> We do not list which kind of donations we got on that page, which is good,
> otherwise we'd have to start some kind of ranking, depending on the amount of
> hardware/whatever a company sponsored, and that's something we clearly neither
> want to have nor should we point out to the public. New companies are added at
> the end of the list, which is not the best thing, too, but fine so far.
I disagree strongly with that. If anything, the likes of bytemark,
ubc-ece, man-da should be on top, followed by eaton, 1&1, dg-i, etc.
There also should be some aging process. If you don't want to sort by
"value", at least sort by age. With 2013 at the top.
--
| .''`. ** Debian **
Peter Palfrader | : :' : The universal
http://www.palfrader.org/ | `. `' Operating System
| `- http://www.debian.org/
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130830065811.gj17...@anguilla.noreply.org
