Hi all, sorry, what's the rationale for this cosmetic (formatting only) changes, breaking translations unnecessarily:
--- tech-ctte.wml 2013/02/25 19:47:59 1.57 +++ tech-ctte.wml 2013/02/27 16:55:57 1.58 @@ -119,57 +119,57 @@ <ul> <li>2012-12-21 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/688772";>Bug #688772:</a>The committee overrules the dependency of meta-gnome on -network-manager while concerns raised in <a -href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834#273";>§4 of the decision in -#681834</a> remain unaddressed.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/688772";>Bug #688772</a>: + The committee overrules the dependency of meta-gnome + on network-manager while concerns raised in <a + href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834#273";>§4 of the + decision in #681834</a> remain unaddressed.</li> <li>2012-10-05 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/573745";>Bug #573745</a>: The - committee declines to change the maintainer of python packages in - Debian.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/573745";>Bug #573745</a>: + The committee declines to change the maintainer + of python packages in Debian.</li> <li>2012-09-14 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834";>Bug #681834</a>: gnome-core - should Recommends: network-manager; override maintainer.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681834";>Bug #681834</a>: gnome-core + should Recommends: network-manager; override maintainer.</li> <li>2012-08-24 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681783";>Bug #681783</a>: - Policy on Recommends is correct; Recommends is fine in metapackages.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681783";>Bug #681783</a>: Policy on + Recommends is correct; Recommends is fine in metapackages.</li> <li>2012-08-14 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681687";>Bug #681687</a>: - evince's lack of mime type entry for PDF is RC bug - (decline to overrule release team).</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/681687";>Bug #681687</a>: + evince's lack of mime type entry for PDF is RC bug + (decline to overrule release team).</li> <li>2012-07-12 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/614907";>Bug #614907</a>: nodejs must - use /usr/bin/nodejs, node must change to ax25-node and provide - /usr/sbin/ax25-node, and transition packages and legacy packages - defined.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/614907";>Bug #614907</a>: + nodejs must use /usr/bin/nodejs, node must change + to ax25-node and provide /usr/sbin/ax25-node, and + transition packages and legacy packages defined.</li> <li>2012-04-05 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/640874";>Bug #640874</a>: decline to - override policy maintainers. debian/rules must be a Makefile.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/640874";>Bug #640874</a>: decline to + override policy maintainers. debian/rules must be a Makefile.</li> <li>2012-03-21 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/629385";>Bug #629385</a>: - dpkg-buildpackage will implement build-arch testing using make - -qn.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/629385";>Bug #629385</a>: + dpkg-buildpackage will implement build-arch testing using make -qn.</li> <li>2012-02-27 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/607368";>Bug #607368</a>: decline to - override the kernel maintainer team's ABI numbering policy.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/607368";>Bug #607368</a>: decline to + override the kernel maintainer team's ABI numbering policy.</li> <li>2012-02-05 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/658341";>Bug #658341</a>: multi-arch - enabled dpkg may be uploaded to experimental and unstable by Raphaël - Hertzog without waiting for primary maintainer code review.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/658341";>Bug #658341</a>: multi-arch + enabled dpkg may be uploaded to experimental and unstable by Raphaël + Hertzog without waiting for primary maintainer code review.</li> <li>2010-12-01 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/587886";>Bug #587886</a>: lilo - should remain in unstable. Matt Arnold and Joachim Wiedorn are to - be joint maintainers of lilo.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/587886";>Bug #587886</a>: + lilo should remain in unstable. Matt Arnold and Joachim + Wiedorn are to be joint maintainers of lilo.</li> <li>2009-09-04 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/535645";>Bug #535645</a>: decline to - override ftp team's removal of ia32-libs-tools; reaffirm ftp team's - ability to remove packages; recommend clarification of - reasons for removal, and mechanism of reintroduction to the - archive.</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/535645";>Bug #535645</a>: + decline to override ftp team's removal of ia32-libs-tools; + reaffirm ftp team's ability to remove packages; + recommend clarification of reasons for removal, + and mechanism of reintroduction to the archive.</li> <li>2009-08-27 - <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/510415";>Bug #510415</a>: allow Qmail - into Debian after fixing delayed-bounce issue with RC bug to block - transition for one month</li> + <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/510415";>Bug #510415</a>: + allow Qmail into Debian after fixing delayed-bounce + issue with RC bug to block transition for one month</li> <li>2009-07-30 <a href="http://bugs.debian.org/539158";>Bug #539158</a>: refuse to override udev maintainer; printf suggested to be documented as a -- = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = Created with Sylpheed 3.0.2 under D e b i a n G N U / L I N U X 6.0 ( S q u e e z e ) Registered LinuxUser #311290 - http://linuxcounter.net/ = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = = -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20130320092833.8a2ad00c.li...@wansing-online.de
