On Sat, Oct 13, 2012 at 08:28:18PM -0300, Henrique de Moraes Holschuh wrote: > On Sat, 13 Oct 2012, Paul Tagliamonte wrote: > > > How about the attached patch? > > > > Looks great to me. Calling it restricted is technically correct, and > > well, that's the the best kind of correct. > > I second this (I am on the camp of "we need/should keep the restricted > logo"). I consider this an acceptable compromise.
I second the patch (I was in the camp of "put the bottle logo in a museum".) As Henrique wrote, the patch is an acceptable compromise. Regards, Bart Martens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20121014053716.ga...@master.debian.org
