Le Fri, Sep 07, 2012 at 05:31:06PM -0400, David Prévot a écrit : > > Agreed: the inconvenience of playing with submodules is probably not > worth the effort. The main (only?) two issues to be fixed in order to > consider the switch from CVS to Git are probably: > - adapt the current translation-check codes to use sha1 sums instead;
Hi all, an alternative is to emulate CVS revisions by using keyword expansions. http://git-scm.com/book/en/Customizing-Git-Git-Attributes#Keyword-Expansion Apparently this would need two sets of change: - Implement the Git configuration to emulate CVS revisions, - Change the scripts that get the revsision number, as they do this via CVS, not just by parsing the files. Have a nice week-end, -- Charles Plessy Tsurumi, Kanagawa, Japan -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120907235657.ga25...@falafel.plessy.net
