On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 11:11:48PM +0100, Stefano Zacchiroli wrote: > [ TL;DR: would you object re-licensing www.d.o content under dual > MIT/Expat + GPL-2 ? ]
> What do you think? I am happy for all my contributions I have done for the Debian website (which admittedly have not been a lot recently) including any of the scripts or php dynamic pages (if any are left) to be re-licensed under the dual-license MIT/Expat and GPL-2+ I'm not sure if nm.d.o carries any of my code anymore but it covers that. I have no problems with the "or later" and actually consider it an essential part of the license for GPL. FWIW anything I contribute in future can also be licensed under this dual license too. Stefano, there's a bunch of stuff at SPI I did too, let me know if they want something similar. I cannot remember now what I said about their logo for example. - Craig -- Craig Small VK2XLZ http://enc.com.au/ csmall at : enc.com.au Debian GNU/Linux http://www.debian.org/ csmall at : debian.org GPG fingerprint: 5D2F B320 B825 D939 04D2 0519 3938 F96B DF50 FEA5
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
