Your message dated Sun, 13 Feb 2011 11:30:20 +0200
with message-id <87ipwop9hv.GNU's_Not_Unix!%ya...@gnu.org>
and subject line Re: Terminology issue: GNU/NetBSD
has caused the Debian Bug report #419081,
regarding www.debian.org: Terminology issue: GNU/NetBSD
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
419081: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=419081
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: important
Tags: patch
[(X-Debbugs-)CCing the porters' list]
The Debian GNU/kNetBSD port is referred incorrectly as "GNU/NetBSD".
I assume this mistake was not intentional and the pages just haven't
been updated for a while. By contrast, this is not the case with
kfreebsd-gnu -- the GNU/kFreeBSD folks have been referring to the
system with its proper name (also on wiki.d.o). We (the GNU
Webmasters) would be grateful if this issue is fixed, so that we can
amend the last paragraph of [1] in a similar fashion like [2].
Please consider applying the attached patch.
The old kfreebsd port page [3] is deprecated, but it is included in
the diff since it is still online. I didn't touch anything under
/News, /events and the translations.
Also, I was wondering why the knetbsd-gnu ports are still called
netbsd-i386 and netbsd-alpha (i.e. without the "k" prefix)? Is this
for historical reasons? dpkg-architecture lists both variants.
[1] http://www.gnu.org/gnu/gnu-linux-faq.html#bsd
[2] http://www.gnu.org/gnu/linux-and-gnu.html#gnubsd
[3] http://www.debian.org/ports/freebsd/bsd-libc-based
-- System Information:
Debian Release: lenny/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i586)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.18-4-486
Locale: LANG=bg_BG.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=bg_BG.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
knetbsd.diff
Description: Binary data
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
David Prévot wrote:
> is it safe to close this bug
Yes, it is -- I'm doing it now. Thanks.
--- End Message ---
