W. Martin Borgert wrote: > Hi, > > I like to ask for opinions/help/contribution regarding the lenny > release notes: > > 0. credits > 1. too many bug reports open, missing tests, deadlines > 2. hyphenation with dblatex > 3. size of PDFs with xmlroff on etch > 4. compilation time with dblatex on etch
> 1. Too many bug reports open, missing tests, deadlines That's the reason why I got the last sentence(s) added to the latest release update. Unfortunately I'm busy with other stuff... > 3. Size of PDFs with xmlroff on etch > > When you build the lenny release notes on etch, even with > the xmlroff backport from lenny, I got Huge PDFs for some > languages. I assume, that we need a backport of libcairo2 to > get reasonable sized PDFs or just build on a lenny machine. > The PDF for ml is 69× bigger when build on etch, zh_CN still > 6.7× bigger! We need to fix this or change the Makefile: > > -DISABLED_PDF= > +DISABLED_PDF=cs ja ml pl ro ru vi zh_CN zh_TW > > Anybody up for libcairo2 backport to etch? I uploaded a backport yesterday after coordination with the maintainers, please check out if it's ok and we can ask to install it on www-master. > 4. Compilation time with dblatex on etch > > When you build the lenny release notes on etch, even with > the dblatex backport from lenny, I experienced that it > compiles 6.5× times slower than the same version on lenny. > Is it my broken etch setup? Is it the older Python? Another > reason to build on lenny, if it were possible... I asked DSA and unfortunately it won't be possible to upgrade www-master before the release. So either things work out with backports or we have to figure out some other solution. Cheers Luk -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-www-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org