On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Francesco Poli wrote: > On Thu, 17 Jul 2008 16:42:16 +0200 Jens Seidel wrote: > > On Thu, Jul 17, 2008 at 01:13:18PM +0200, Pau Ruŀlan Ferragut wrote: > > > Most of the links in http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ are broken, > > > such as > > > the FAQ itself. Please have a look at them. > > > > Most? > > > > OK, a few are indeed broken and I suggest to use the following URLs > > instead. Since this is license stuff it would be nice if it could be > > checked (just in case a license changed (such as X's one and the old > > link referred to a older version than my new proposal, ...). > > > > MIT/X11-style licenses: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIT_License > > Actually, the MIT_License wikipedia page currently includes the > Expat/MIT license, not the X11/MIT license. I would suggest to use the > following link: > > Expat/MIT license: http://www.jclark.com/xml/copying.txt
OK, did so. Linking to Wikipedia would ensure that the link is always up to date and this page contains also further info. But Ok I changed it as suggested by you (inclusive s,X11/MIT,Expat/MIT,). > The so-called X11/MIT license uses a slightly different wording and > also includes a clause forbidding unauthorized use of names in > advertising. > Unfortunately, I cannot find a currently valid URL for the X11/MIT > license. The text is quoted in one of my old bug reports: > http://bugs.debian.org/284340 > If anyone finds a valid URL for the X11/MIT, I would be very interested > to know... > Please note that http://www.xfree86.org/3.3.6/COPYRIGHT2.html#3 > is close, but not equal to the license I used to know as the X11 license The Python link is now fixed as well. Thanks, Jens -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
