* Riku Voipio <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2008-02-06 14:10:28 CET]: > On Wed, Feb 06, 2008 at 12:55:12PM +0100, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > > This is not true. armel is not "fully supported", especially not for a > > stable release, and: > > Looking at the other ports pages, it seems the port pages generally talk > about the status of ports on latest stable release.
Does this mean you confirm why I asked for further explanations? ;) > > > +Both ports will coexist during Lenny but afterwards arm port will die. > > > > ... armel isn't in lenny (yet). > > Hector's choice of words is quite unfortunate :) But the > information that needs to be passed to users is that a) armel is being > integrated to debian as we speak and porters are working to get it included > in lenny b) after lenny the old arm port will be depreceated in favour > of armel. Please keep in mind that I'm not following any arm related lists nor am I part of the debian admin team so I hope you don't mind the question about how far this integration is being discussed with the appropriate people who are able to actually do the relevant changes. > > On what things is your wish to change the webpages based? > > When one is used to dealing with unstable day to day basis with > an agressive look forward, the current arm port page seem so outdated. > Then again I see the hppa port refers to linuxcare, a seven years dead > company ;) As you mentioned yourself that Hector's wording wasn't accurate and his patch mentioned you as port maintainer (should you be added to /intro/organization with that then, too?) it would be nice if you can go over the patch again and clear up things a bit. So long, Rhonda -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
