On Fri, 21 Apr 2006 10:56:30 -0600 Bdale Garbee wrote: > On Thu, 2006-04-20 at 15:48 -0700, Don Armstrong wrote: > > > Should we decide to change the license, we should either use the MIT > > license if we don't want it to be copyleft, or the GPL if we do. A > > custom license is not something that we want to write, and > > especially not without serious thought and consideration between > > people who have a great deal of experience in writing licenses. > > > > Contributing to license proliferation by a license which is not > > compatible with the GPL and some other free software licenses is not > > something that we want to do. > > Thank you for saying that before I could get around to it, Don. I > strongly agree.
Needless to say, I agree too (as it should already be clear from my
other contributions to this discussion...).
--
:-( This Universe is buggy! Where's the Creator's BTS? ;-)
......................................................................
Francesco Poli GnuPG Key ID = DD6DFCF4
Key fingerprint = C979 F34B 27CE 5CD8 DC12 31B5 78F4 279B DD6D FCF4
pgp6bhzvLY3Lf.pgp
Description: PGP signature
