-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am 31.03.2006 um 10:59 schrieb Alexander Rødseth:
Here's a page a just made about rounded corners, which includes a
screenshot of how jagged the corners look at my computer:
http://www.pvv.org/~alexanro/rounded.html
1. Tables are for tabular data! Use semantic markup!
2. We have had such corners in a table layout, which took a lot of
hours unpaid work to be removed.
3. your example goes totally jagged with large font setting.
You critizism is about a bit out of the way as nobody is payed her
for several hundreds of hours a year.
I personally am convinced that having page working for _everyone_ is
much more importand than image corners with invalid HTML. And no. if
they would look that ugly you try to make us believe, someone would
have noted out that a year ago already.
Not an option, if you want to display the navbar well with font-
sizes from very small up to extremely large.
For larger text boxes images are an option, for small ones like
the blue ones in the navbar, not.
Why isn't it an option?
Because the pages are for _everyone_ and have not to be broken for
people with bad eyes.
If you do not understand, why breaking accessibility is not an
option, I cannot do anything by that.
We have to care that 22,000 page work with the layout. That needs
several hundred vountary work a year. So it might be enough for you:
we will have another solution for the corners, if ther is one, which
is really an option without breaking accessibility.
greetings
Jutta
- --
http://www.witch.westfalen.de
http://witch.muensterland.org
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iEYEARECAAYFAkQtduYACgkQOgZ5N97kHkfIXwCgvY1PHSmYaAwB3pKs964t2h3n
6MQAn0nI9A1CBUUvJPGZAuMOlv6d+0qc
=s1o8
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
