On Tuesday 18 October 2005 18:11, Peter Karlsson wrote: > That looks like a bug in Konqueror, in that it doesn't autodetect the > UTF-8 encoding properly. Not that a BOM is needed for UTF-8 anyway, but > that's another story...
Ah, I see what you mean. BOM [1] was a new term to me. If it is not needed, I would propose to delete it anyway. Is it wise to rely on automatic UTF-8 detection? Wouldn't it be better to explicitly define the encoding in the header? I would guess there will be other browsers affected... [1] http://www.unicode.org/faq/utf_bom.html#BOM
pgp9hi5gDHpNJ.pgp
Description: PGP signature