Jutta Wrage <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 1. The feeds are not really two alternate views ot that page, what > the alternate header fields make assume. > application/rss+xml title "RSS 2.0" for _all_ headings as RSS2.0 > feed in the index page would be one [...]
It is an RDF Site Summary (RSS 1.0) and not a Really Simply Syndication (aka RSS 0.92 or 2.0) feed, isn't it? Quite rightly too: it's great that debian supports the richer, more open and standards-based format. As a sometime lynx user, I agree that having RSS in the title would be nice. I disagree with your main point: they are alternates (as security announcements do appear on the page), and they are marked clearly as security advisories in the titles. Hope that helps, -- MJ Ray (slef), Lynn, England, to email see http://mjr.towers.org.uk/ -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
