Your message dated Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:30:53 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#322152: Please mention forums.debian.net
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Aug 2005 11:19:10 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Aug 09 04:19:09 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from 220pc220.sshunet.nl (mordor.wolffelaar.nl) [145.97.220.220]
(Debian-exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E2S8T-0003PC-00; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 04:19:09 -0700
Received: from jeroen by mordor.wolffelaar.nl with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1E2S8S-0004Dk-2a
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 09 Aug 2005 13:19:08 +0200
Date: Tue, 9 Aug 2005 13:19:07 +0200
From: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Please mention forums.debian.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
X-Reportbug-Version: 3.8
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: wishlist
Hi,
forums.debian.net, which for full disclosure, I started and host, has
been steadily gaining popularity in the past year, and consequently it
has become a resource for new Debian users with actually quite a good
chance of getting a useful response.
Web forums draw a bit a different audience than mailinglists and IRC,
especially the experience of users visiting such forums typically is
relatively low. This does make it quite new-user friendly resource.
With now well over 700 contributions per month and steadily growing, I
think it makes sense to mention these web forums somewhere on the
debian.org website, for example http://www.debian.org/support#web.
The current list of 4 websites is a bit on the short side in my opinion
anyway, with also only 1 out of 4 websites actually being
Debian-specific. A simple google query alone give a lot more useful
resources for Debian users.
Thanks,
--Jeroen
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.8-2-686
Locale: LANG=nl_NL.UTF-8, LC_CTYPE=nl_NL.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
--
Jeroen van Wolffelaar
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://jeroen.A-Eskwadraat.nl
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 322152-done) by bugs.debian.org; 14 Aug 2005 16:31:33 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sun Aug 14 09:31:33 2005
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoot.lafn.org [206.117.18.6]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.36 1 (Debian))
id 1E4LOX-0001G9-00; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:31:33 -0700
Received: from localhost.localdomain
(pool-71-104-165-253.lsanca.dsl-w.verizon.net [71.104.165.253])
(authenticated bits=0)
by zoot.lafn.org (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id j7EGVG6o067168
(version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO);
Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:31:17 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost.localdomain with local (Exim 4.52)
id 1E4LNu-0006Fj-62; Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:30:54 -0700
Date: Sun, 14 Aug 2005 09:30:53 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Steve Kemp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: Jeroen van Wolffelaar <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: Re: Bug#322152: Please mention forums.debian.net
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="egxrhndXibJAPJ54"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: ClamAV 0.86.2/1018/Sun Aug 14 09:05:58 2005 on zoot.lafn.org
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
--egxrhndXibJAPJ54
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 02:48:09PM +0100, Steve Kemp wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 01:19:07PM +0200, Jeroen van Wolffelaar wrote:
>=20
> > forums.debian.net, which for full disclosure, I started and host, has
> > been steadily gaining popularity in the past year, and consequently it
> > has become a resource for new Debian users with actually quite a good
> > chance of getting a useful response.
>=20
> It is a good site too, which helps.
>=20
> > With now well over 700 contributions per month and steadily growing, I
> > think it makes sense to mention these web forums somewhere on the
> > debian.org website, for example http://www.debian.org/support#web.
> > The current list of 4 websites is a bit on the short side in my opinion
> > anyway, with also only 1 out of 4 websites actually being
> > Debian-specific. A simple google query alone give a lot more useful
> > resources for Debian users.
>=20
> I agree, and would also pimp my site ;)
I've added links to the above site and your site to the support page.
> My suggestion would be to move the URLs listed in the page:
>=20
> http://www.us.debian.org/misc/related_links
>=20
> I'm not too sure which way it should be, either move the misc/related
> sites into support#web, or vice-versa. But having two lists which
> overlap so significantly is unnecessary duplication IMHO.
For the moment, I've removed the debianHELP site from
misc/related_links and added a link to the list of support web sites
to the TOC. Does anyone know whether the non-English portals provide
news or support?
--=20
Matt
--egxrhndXibJAPJ54
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFC/3G8fNdgYxVXvBARAsimAJ94KSaXWCu8B3CAhwcfsLQgWGMi+QCePfTn
mr3CEoduKIx36uDUEsCYtzU=
=qLkf
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--egxrhndXibJAPJ54--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
