Your message dated Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:36:04 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line release notes fixed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 9 Feb 2004 09:16:50 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Feb 09 01:16:50 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from rhols66.adsl.netsonic.fi (there.afraid.org) [194.29.198.66]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Aq7X7-0007n2-00; Mon, 09 Feb 2004 01:16:50 -0800
Received: by there.afraid.org (Postfix, from userid 1000)
id 381574577; Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:15:51 +0200 (EET)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Mon, 9 Feb 2004 11:15:51 +0200
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: Woody i386 release notes are actually for s390
X-Debbugs-CC: era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Mailer: VM 7.03 under Emacs 20.7.2
From: era eriksson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,X_DEBBUGS_CC
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: 20040209
Severity: normal
Looks like <http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/release-notes/i386/>
actually contains release notes for S/390 instead of Intel x86 as one
would expect.
I have inspected the following files:
release-notes.da.txt
release-notes.en.pdf
release-notes.en.txt
release-notes.es.txt
release-notes/index.html
... and at least all of these sampled documents were the wrong version.
See <http://thread.gmane.org/gmane.linux.debian.devel.documentation/3133>
for a genuine case.
/* era */
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Kernel Version: Linux there.afraid.org 2.2.20 #1 SMP Thu Nov 7 16:15:53 EET
2002 i586 unknown
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 231852-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Dec 2004 23:36:26 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Dec 02 15:36:26 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ca0Us-0003r3-00; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 15:36:26 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1Ca0UW-0005pG-A8
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Fri, 03 Dec 2004 00:36:04 +0100
Date: Fri, 3 Dec 2004 00:36:04 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: release notes fixed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
There is no version of the release notes at doc/manuals/ anymore.
The flaw in the build system that caused the error described in
the bug report has been fixed, too.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
