On Sun, Nov 21, 2004 at 01:23:26PM +0100, Jutta Wrage wrote: > > Am Sonntag, 21.11.04 um 05:00 Uhr schrieb Mike Hommey: > > >It is wrong. xhtml 1.0 pages SHOULD be served as application/xhtml+xml > >but can be served as text/html for compatibility purpose. > > Can you point me to the source, where it says that they may be served > without application/xhtml+xml without any problems?
http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml-media-types/#summary Note that XHTML 1.0 (HTML compatible) stands for XHTML following the HTML compatibility guidelines from http://www.w3.org/TR/xhtml1/#guidelines , which is anyways a good thing to follow not to hurt old browsers. Mike
