On Mon, Nov 08, 2004 at 11:54:15AM +0100, Wouter Verhelst wrote: > > I'm considering uploading the attached content to the webwml sources (i.e. > > the Debian website) at w.d.o/debian/buildd/. > > As most of this content is developer-oriented, shouldn't this be > /devel/buildd/ ?
Agggg. Correct, it's devel/buildd (and that's where I have it in my local sources, the previous reference was a typo) > I have no problem with my content being reused for www.debian.org; > however, in that case I would appreciate it if I could maintain it > there (i.e., if someone could give me CVS access). I cannot provide that access, but I'm sure the www maintainers would gladly give it to you once this has been setup. > However, one little correction: (.. patch ..) Fixed, thanks. > However, if you check the version number of the package in the Packages > file, and check where the Sources file has its base URL, you can > download the source tarball. I can't find the package in the sid Packages file, is it 'buildd'? A previous mail from you [1] points to http://db.debian.org/debian-admin/ but that location is not available any more (I believe you are already aware of that) > I agree that it would be better if the source would be readily > downloadable, but that is currently not the case. Yes, most unfortunate. I've been able to find a buildd package, however, at http://people.debian.org/~rleigh/buildd/ I wonder if this one is recommended/used? Regards Javier [1] http://lists.debian.org/debian-devel/2004/06/msg007006.html
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
