Your message dated Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:02:12 +0100
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Done
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 28 Sep 2004 10:18:23 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Sep 28 03:18:23 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.134.107]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CCF3u-00028q-00; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 03:18:23 -0700
Received: from pd953071b.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.27] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CCF4u-0001wz-1Y
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:19:24 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCF3N-0001gu-Q1
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:17:49 +0200
Resent-From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 12:17:49 +0200
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Received: from localhost ([127.0.0.1])
by feynman.djpig.de with esmtp (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCEXZ-0001Us-1u
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:44:57 +0200
Received: from pop3.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191]
by localhost with POP3 (fetchmail-6.2.5)
for [EMAIL PROTECTED] (single-drop); Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:44:57 +0200
(CEST)
Received: from murphy.debian.org ([146.82.138.6])
by mail.lenk.info with esmtp (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CCEUy-0007DS-Ij
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:42:16 +0200
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with QMQP
id A02022E003; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:39:05 -0500 (CDT)
Old-Return-Path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Original-To: debian-www@lists.debian.org
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net (mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.134.107])
by murphy.debian.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 947422DF7E
for <debian-www@lists.debian.org>; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:39:04 -0500 (CDT)
Received: from pd953071b.dip.t-dialin.net ([217.83.7.27] helo=feynman.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:RSA_ARCFOUR_SHA:16) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1CCESs-0001wJ-F9; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:40:06 +0200
Received: from djpig by feynman.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1CCERM-0001U3-Fk; Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:38:32 +0200
Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 11:38:32 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Kevin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Cc: debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: packages.debian.org
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mail-Followup-To: Kevin Price <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>,
debian-www@lists.debian.org, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Rc-Virus: 2004-07-20_01
X-Rc-Spam: 2004-08-29_01
Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Resent-From: debian-www@lists.debian.org
X-Mailing-List: <debian-www@lists.debian.org> archive/latest/18689
X-Loop: debian-www@lists.debian.org
List-Id: <debian-www.lists.debian.org>
List-Post: <mailto:debian-www@lists.debian.org>
List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
List-Archive: <http://lists.debian.org/debian-www/>
Precedence: list
Resent-Date: Tue, 28 Sep 2004 04:39:05 -0500 (CDT)
X-Resent-For: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Resent-Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Package: www.debian.org
Severity: minor
Tags: confirmed
On Tue, Sep 28, 2004 at 05:37:42AM +0200, Kevin Price wrote:
> I have two suggestions to make about improving packages.debian.org. I fin=
d=20
> myself using it quite much, and it is very well done. I really missed it =
in=20
> the time after the attack last year. Thanks for getting it back up.
>=20
> 1. In every binary package page the dependencies are listed as
> "depends"
> "recommended"
> "suggested"
>=20
> What is this "time warp" for? I suggest to use consistent grammar and=20
> change them all to simple present.
Sounds reasonable. Changed in CVS, will be changed on the page somewhen
near in the future.
> 2. From <http://packages.debian.org/src:hello> I get a nice page includin=
g=20
> all distributions and the sources. But the links to the binaries lead onl=
y=20
> to some intermediate page, where the link might point directly to the goa=
l.
Yeah, should do that sometime. Recorded in the BTS with this mail.
Gruesse,
--=20
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFBWTEYQbn06FtxPfARAgYiAJ44bOmyuX4+TUGJZK0c1+Pdcz/U7wCff+qV
s8BTFt8X4If1I78K4iX0cD0=
=/iZe
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--uZ3hkaAS1mZxFaxD--
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 273820-done) by bugs.debian.org; 2 Nov 2004 00:04:22 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Mon Nov 01 16:04:22 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from higgs.djpig.de [213.133.98.126]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1COm9u-000827-00; Mon, 01 Nov 2004 16:04:22 -0800
Received: from djpig by higgs.djpig.de with local (Exim 4.34)
id 1COm7o-0002yn-5T
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 02 Nov 2004 01:02:12 +0100
Date: Tue, 2 Nov 2004 01:02:12 +0100
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Done
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040722i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
This is changed now.
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
