Your message dated Sun, 1 Aug 2004 02:08:51 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#260274:
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 6 Feb 2004 12:14:42 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Feb 06 04:14:42 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pantene.yandex.ru [213.180.200.35]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Ap4sb-00065r-00; Fri, 06 Feb 2004 04:14:41 -0800
Received: from YAMAIL (pantene.yandex.ru) by mail.yandex.ru
id <S1816298AbUBFMOF>; Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:14:05 +0300
Date: Fri, 6 Feb 2004 15:14:05 +0300 (MSK)
From: "Alexander Konovalenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Reply-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ]
Errors-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: packages.debian.org: copyright files are missing for some packages
X-source-ip: 212.179.124.53
Content-Type: text/plain;
charset="US-ASCII"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_02_01
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Summary
-------
For some packages at packages.debian.org links to their copyright files
are broken.
Details
-------
Steps to reproduce the problem:
1. Go to the package page
http://packages.debian.org/stable/devel/kernel-source-2.4.18
2. Click on the "view copyright file" link at the bottom of the page.
3. The page
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.18/kernel-source-2.4.18_2.4.18-14.1/copyright
is 404 Not Found.
This problem occurs for package
http://packages.debian.org/stable/base/kernel-image-2.4.18-bf2.4
as well. The broken "copyright file" link leads to
http://packages.debian.org/changelogs/pool/main/k/kernel-source-2.4.18/kernel-source-2.4.18_2.4.18-14.1/copyright
I saw more broken links yesterday, but now I either can't remember where it was
or can't reproduce it.
-- Alexander Konovalenko
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 260274-done) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Aug 2004 00:09:34 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Sat Jul 31 17:09:34 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mail.sorgfalt.net [217.160.169.191]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Br3uw-00074X-00; Sat, 31 Jul 2004 17:09:34 -0700
Received: from p54808f24.dip.t-dialin.net ([84.128.143.36] helo=djpig.djpig.de)
by mail.sorgfalt.net with asmtp
(Cipher TLS-1.0:DHE_RSA_3DES_EDE_CBC_SHA:24) (Exim 4.34 1)
id 1Br3uq-0005ux-8X
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 02:09:28 +0200
Received: from djpig by djpig.djpig.de with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1Br3uF-0003lt-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 02:08:51 +0200
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 02:08:51 +0200
From: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#260274:
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL
PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
Sender: Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, Jul 20, 2004 at 09:42:08AM +0200, Erik Schanze wrote:
> Yes, if we wouldn't touch the Policy, unpacking the binary would be fine for
> these cases.
> My suggestion is:
> If there is a copyright file in source package
> then unpack it from source package
> else unpack it from binary package
>
>
> Please switch to this, if there are no cons (that I cannot see from here).
> Thank you.
Done. The extract_changelogs script is still running, but should be
fixed tomorrow. There are at least to cases where this doesn't work yet:
- documentation directory is link to different source package, but this
is a bug (filed one against alsa-modules-i386, which is the only known
case so far)
- source package and binary package have different version numbers.
(Since there is no information in the source package which versions
of binary packages belong to it, this will require some trickery,
patches welcome, will note it in the TODO file)
Gruesse,
--
Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
www: http://www.djpig.de/
