Your message dated Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:37:29 +0200
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug closed
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 18 Jun 2004 15:30:32 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 08:30:32 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from pcsp162-10.supercabletv.net.co (www.gfc.edu.co) [200.106.162.10]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbLK4-0004bb-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 08:30:32 -0700
Received: from igotam by www.gfc.edu.co with local (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian))
id 1BbLJz-00056G-00
for <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:30:27 -0500
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: add translation of
http://www.debian.org/MailingLists/index
X-Debbugs-CC: Igor Támara <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Message-Id: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
From: =?iso-8859-1?Q?Igor_T=E1mara?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:30:27 -0500
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-11.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-06-18
Severity: normal
-- System Information
Debian Release: 3.0
Architecture: i386
Kernel: Linux gfc 2.4.18-1-686 #1 Wed Apr 14 18:20:10 UTC 2004 i686
Locale: LANG=es_CO, LC_CTYPE=es_CO
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 255064-close) by bugs.debian.org; 1 Jul 2004 18:37:31 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Thu Jul 01 11:37:31 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from tornado.dat.etsit.upm.es (dat.etsit.upm.es) [138.100.17.73]
by spohr.debian.org with smtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1Bg6R9-0004jn-00; Thu, 01 Jul 2004 11:37:31 -0700
Received: (qmail 26001 invoked by uid 1013); 1 Jul 2004 18:37:29 -0000
Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2004 20:37:29 +0200
From: Javier =?iso-8859-1?Q?Fern=E1ndez-Sanguino_Pe=F1a?= <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Bug closed
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU"
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040523i
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-3.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no
version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
This bug is now closed, I've uploaded the translation to the BTS.
Regards
Javier
--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.4 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQFA5Fnpi4sehJTrj0oRAstdAJ485eAcyp1XYGxu5DIi4WR1u4X54ACfVkn+
X5dI25Fy9xmII1q9TU2nEQU=
=w0fj
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--EeQfGwPcQSOJBaQU--
