Your message dated Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:19:25 -0700
with message-id <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
and subject line Bug#241006: www.debian.org: more typos in
devel/constitution.wml
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at maintonly) by bugs.debian.org; 30 Mar 2004 09:51:09 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Tue Mar 30 01:51:09 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from mout0.freenet.de [194.97.50.131] (exim)
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1B8Ftl-0005c7-00; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 01:51:09 -0800
Received: from [194.97.55.148] (helo=mx5.freenet.de)
by mout0.freenet.de with asmtp (Exim 4.309)
id 1B8Ftj-0002jz-WA
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:51:08 +0200
Received: from gc09c.g.pppool.de ([80.185.192.156] helo=oskar)
by mx5.freenet.de with esmtp (Exim 4.303 #3)
id 1B8Ftj-0003xZ-IP
for [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Tue, 30 Mar 2004 11:51:07 +0200
Date: Tue, 30 Mar 2004 12:44:18 +0200
From: Matthias Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Subject: www.debian.org: typos in devel/constitution.wml
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.28i
X-Reportbug-Version: 1.50
Sender: Matthias Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=4.0 tests=HAS_PACKAGE,HTML_MESSAGE,
RCVD_IN_DSBL autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: www.debian.org
Version: N/A; reported 2004-03-30
Severity: minor
Tags: patch
There are some typos in the current version of the Debian Constitution.
Regards,
Matthias Lutz
Index: constitution.wml
===================================================================
RCS file: /cvs/webwml/webwml/english/devel/constitution.wml,v
retrieving revision 1.14
diff -u -r1.14 constitution.wml
--- constitution.wml 1 Nov 2003 04:46:21 -0000 1.14
+++ constitution.wml 30 Mar 2004 09:32:38 -0000
@@ -32,9 +32,9 @@
<LI>The individual Developer working on a particular task;</LI>
<LI>Delegates appointed by the Project Leader for specific
- tasks.</LI>
+ tasks;</LI>
- <LI>The Project Secretary;</LI>
+ <LI>The Project Secretary.</LI>
</OL>
<P>Most of the remainder of this document will outline the powers of
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
<OL>
<LI>If the Project Leader or their Delegate, or the Technical
Committee, has made a decision, then Developers can override them
- by passing a resolution to do so; see s4.1(3).</LI>
+ by passing a resolution to do so; see §4.1(3).</LI>
<LI>If such a resolution is sponsored by at least 2K Developers,
or if it is proposed by the Technical Committee, the resolution
@@ -343,8 +343,8 @@
kept secret, even after the election is finished.</LI>
<LI>The options on the ballot will be those candidates who have
- nominated themselves and have not yet withdrawn, plus None Of The
- Above. If None Of The Above wins the election then the election
+ nominated themselves and have not yet withdrawn, plus "None Of The
+ Above". If "None Of The Above" wins the election then the election
procedure is repeated, many times if necessary.</LI>
<LI>
@@ -382,7 +382,7 @@
developers' reference materials, example packages and the behaviour
of non-experimental package building tools. (In each case the usual
maintainer of the relevant software or documentation makes
- decisions initially, however; see 6.3(5).)</P>
+ decisions initially, however; see §6.3(5).)</P>
</LI>
<LI>
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@
<LI>
<P>The Chairman can stand in for the Leader, together with the
- Secretary</P>
+ Secretary.</P>
<P>As detailed in §7.1(2), the Chairman of the Technical
Committee and the Project Secretary may together stand in for the
@@ -641,8 +641,8 @@
<P>The Delegates are appointed by the Project Leader and may be
replaced by the Leader at the Leader's discretion. The Project Leader
may not make the position as a Delegate conditional on particular
-decisions by the Delegate, nor may they override a decision made by a
-Delegate once made.</P>
+decisions by the Delegate, nor may they override a decision once made by a
+Delegate.</P>
<H3>8.3. Procedure</H3>
@@ -741,7 +741,7 @@
earlier change (again, they must meet the requirements for proposer
and sponsor(s).)</LI>
- <LI>The proposer or a resolution may suggest changes to the wordings
+ <LI>The proposer of a resolution may suggest changes to the wordings
of amendments; these take effect if the proposer of the amendment
agrees and none of the sponsors object. In this case the changed
amendments will be voted on instead of the originals.</LI>
@@ -768,8 +768,8 @@
<LI>The person who calls for a vote states what they believe the
wordings of the resolution and any relevant amendments are, and
consequently what form the ballot should take. However, the final
- decision on the form of ballot(s) is the Secretary's - see 7.1(1),
- 7.1(3) and A.3(4).</LI>
+ decision on the form of ballot(s) is the Secretary's - see
§§7.1(1),
+ 7.1(3), and A.3(4).</LI>
<LI>
The minimum discussion period is counted from the time the last
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@
</LI>
<LI>
- The votes are counted according to the the rules in A.6. The
+ The votes are counted according to the the rules in §A.6. The
default option is "Further Discussion", unless specified
otherwise.
</LI>
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@
<H3>A.4. Withdrawing resolutions or unaccepted amendments</H3>
<P>The proposer of a resolution or unaccepted amendment may withdraw
-it. In this case new proposers may come forward keep it alive, in which
+it. In this case new proposers may come forward to keep it alive, in which
case the first person to do so becomes the new proposer and any others
become sponsors if they aren't sponsors already.</P>
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 241006-done) by bugs.debian.org; 19 Jun 2004 00:22:19 +0000
>From [EMAIL PROTECTED] Fri Jun 18 17:22:18 2004
Return-path: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Received: from zoon.lafn.org [206.117.18.9]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1BbTcg-0000sP-00; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:22:18 -0700
Received: from localhost (host-66-81-20-209.rev.o1.com [66.81.20.209])
by zoon.lafn.org (8.12.3p3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id i5J0MDUg070112;
Fri, 18 Jun 2004 17:22:16 -0700 (PDT)
(envelope-from [EMAIL PROTECTED])
Received: from kraai by localhost with local (Exim 4.32)
id 1BbN1R-0000H1-Hu; Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:19:25 -0700
Date: Fri, 18 Jun 2004 10:19:25 -0700
From: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: Matthias Lutz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: Re: Bug#241006: www.debian.org: more typos in devel/constitution.wml
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
References: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.5.1+cvs20040105i
Sender: Matt Kraai <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
X-Virus-Scanned: clamd / ClamAV version 0.70, clamav-milter version 0.70j
Delivered-To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-5.3 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,DATE_IN_PAST_06_12,
HAS_BUG_NUMBER autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, Jun 15, 2004 at 05:57:34PM +0200, Matthias Lutz wrote:
> there are some more spelling mistakes in the english version of
> devel/constitution.wml. Here is a patch which includes the previous
> corrections and corrections made by Jens Seidel, which he posted on
> debian-l10n-german.
Thanks for the patch. Unfortunately, to change the constitution,
you need to follow the standard amendment process. Please e-mail
debian-vote@lists.debian.org to do so.
--
Matt Kraai [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://ftbfs.org/
