Anthony DeRobertis wrote: > The link to the BSD license under DFSG 10 goes to the revised BSD > license. The DFSG written before the revised license; it should go to > the original one with the advertising clause (unfortunately).
Hmmm. On the one hand, when the DFSG was written, that would be the correct reference. On the other hand, we don't want people who look at the DFSG and say "what license should I use" to pick the old BSD license. Since it is misleading to point the link to the new BSD license, I would sooner suggest that the link be removed entirely, since the original DFSG was probably a text document with no links at all. - Josh Triplett
