On Fri, Apr 30, 2004 at 11:17:29AM +0200, Gerfried Fuchs wrote: > * Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [2004-04-30 03:49]: > > I just completed the first version of these pages (loosly based on the > > pages of the security team), put them online and added a first > > license, OPL, based on the summary on debian-legal by Jeremy Hankins. > > I would say, we definitely need to relicense our website[1], then.... > Last time I've heard about the OPL I was told it is free as long as the > options in VI. aren't used.
Yeah, we should. That's why the severity of the related bug is serious. My problem is that I'm really unsure on _how_ we can do this. The pages themself claim that there content is copyright SPI, so the SPI board would probably do this. But I really don't know if this copyright notice is actually valid... Tricky questions I think. > > You can find these pages on http://www.debian.org/legal/licenses/ (and > > every other mirror of course). > > I would put the <dt> of the DLS in bold or something else so it stands > out a little more. The link to DLS Index shouldn't point to "index". Should I use "./" instead of "index"? Is that what you mean? Gruesse, -- Frank Lichtenheld <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> www: http://www.djpig.de/
